tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8623956572866546967.post6152745212224430815..comments2023-09-07T10:04:40.852-04:00Comments on SHAZAMAHOLIC!: movie review: THE AVENGERSShazamaholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745015382822203379noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8623956572866546967.post-73453983515747097122012-05-11T11:19:55.432-04:002012-05-11T11:19:55.432-04:00It was Pretty Awesome. Loved that they omitted the...It was Pretty Awesome. Loved that they omitted the two most useless Avengers (Ant-Man and Wasp). The inclusion of Widow and Hawkeye leads one to believe they used the Ultimates interpretation (ie. the African American Nick Fury, look of Cap, Members of the first roster of Avengers etc.) more than the 1960's arc. I was impressed with how Whedon was able to grasp each character's better qualities. <br />I kind of liked Ruffalo's portrayal of Bruce Banner a bit more than Nortons. I loved Norton's version of the character, but Ruffalo came across more confident than Norton (mind you, at the end of "Incredible Hulk" Banner learns to control his transformation). I'm still a little mad that the studio screwed Norton out of reprising his role (Norton had produced and even co-wrote the screenplay for his film).<br />Overall, the Film was an Ace!! <br />Will it Sell better than Dark Knight Rises: Yes. <br />Will the story be better than Avengers: YesChrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06442585664478382219noreply@blogger.com